A Recent Experience Of Nicholas Haas Attempting To Speak To Judge Edwin Kelly

Family Court Justice? Think again....

On Wednesday, October 5th 2011, Hooksett Town Official, Nicholas Haas, of Hooksett NH, went to the Honorable Edwin Kelly's office in Concord NH.

Mr. Haas, a concerned citizen of the wrong-doings happening to parents in New Hampshire, was requesting a 10 minute meeting with Judge Kelly.

Mr. Haas spoke with Judge Kelly's Secretary through an intercom, who then told Mr. Haas that Judge Kelly does not meet with citizens involving open cases, and that he can contact Judge Kelly in writing.

A New Hampshire Citizen, requested a meeting with the Administrative Court Judge, only to be denied his rights AS a citizen, to be heard on an issue that involves families all across the state.

Mr. Haas and his wife, Samantha Haas, have tried contacting Judge Kelly "in writing" on more than one occasion.  Sometimes they receive a letter that states Judge Kelly cannot help, and sometimes, the requests in writing simply go unanswered.

ACFC Outlines Efforts In Promoting Shared Parenting Across The U.S.A.

Video Support for Shared Parenting

(From ACFC Website, September 20th, 2011)

Below is another sampling of the ongoing efforts to reform family law. More and more legislators are taking a public stand for Shared Parenting. Momentum continues to grow as efforts to reform family law continue.

Blue October and Shared Parenting Seattle Style 
The Showbox in Seattle, Wa. was the latest stop this past Sunday in Blue October’s 40 city tour supporting their new album ‘Any Man In America’ and promoting Shared Parenting. From the show comes this great video of state Senator Jim Kastama talking with the audience about Shared Parenting. Senator Katsama is a long time supporter of Shared Parenting. While there is still plenty of room for improvement, shared parenting is on the rise in Washington. Note the tremendous crowd response at both the beginning and end of the video in support of Shared Parenting. The public ‘gets it.’ In legislative sessions earlier this year ACFC affiliates and supporters played pivotal roles in the introduction of Shared Parenting bills in over a dozen states.

Judicial Child Abuse Blog Runs Article About NH Attorney And Guardian Ad Litem Tracy A. Bernson - It Appears Bernson Owes The IRS Nearly $30K In Unpaid Taxes!

Tuesday, November 22, 2011

Judicial Child Abuser, Attorney & GALTracy A. Bernson: Deadbeat Tax Evader

Investigators from the STOP! Judicial Child Abuse research department have uncovered a federal tax lien levied  against Judicial Child Abuser, Attorney and  GAL Tracy A. Bernson.  Her New Hampshire Bar Identification number is: 15562

It appears from the "Notice of Federal Tax Lien" filed August 214th, 2010, that Attorney & GAL Tracy A. Bernson owes the IRS nearly $30,000 in unpaid taxes!

It is abundantly clear exactly why Attorney & GAL Tracy A. Bernson regularly files "Motions to Exceed Fees" in cases to which she is appointed - she needs to pilfer money from the N.H. Judicial System to pay her own back taxes!

Our researchers are currently investigating all cases to which Tracy A. Bernson was appointed as Guardian ad Litem to determine the extent of the fraud that she has been perpetrating upon the N.H. Judicial System.

It is the opinion of STOP! Judicial Child Abuse that potential or would-be clients of this Judicial Child Abuser and tax-evader avoid doing business with this evidently unethical, corrupt, law-violating practitioner.

 

Man Seeks Restitution From Ex-Wife In Fraud Case - From Citizen.Com

Man seeks restitution from ex-wife in fraud case - citizen.com: Laconia: laconia, new hampton, belknap county superior court,

Man seeks restitution from ex-wife in fraud case

By BEA LEWIS blewis@citizen.com | Posted: Monday, November 21, 2011 6:00 am

LACONIA — A New Hampton man says he feels victimized by his ex-wife as well as the justice system.

David Prutzanni, 56, of 714 Straights Rd., New Hampton, claims in documents on file at the Belknap County Superior Court in Laconia that his now-ex-wife fraudulently signed his name to numerous checks, stealing $86,000 from a home equity line of credit and an additional $14,000 in cash from his personal checking account. He alleges she used the bulk of the money to buy drugs.

Prutzanni’s ex-wife, JeanMarie Leonard, 52, of Laconia, was indicted in April on a Class B felony charge of forgery. The state charged that, in October 2005, she executed a written home equity line of credit agreement, disclosure statement and note by signing Prutzanni’s signature without his authorization and that her intent was to defraud.

Join the Cause Against Judicial Corruption

(From the "Defend Yourself" blog)

One click to say you want HONESTY in government.

Also below these reports join and watch an important show on Nov. 20th.
Check it out.

Corruption Reports

Sexual Misconduct
Criminal Acts
Perjury
Search All Reports
U.S. Senators
U.S. Congressmen
Governors
Mayors
Judges
Law Enforcement

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Ron Branson on Lawless America Show -- Sunday November 20, 2011 - 5-7 pm ET

Thursday, 17 November 2011 00:00

William M. Windsor

The Lawless America Government Corruption Crisis Online TV Show will be held Sunday November 20, 2011 from 5 to 7 pm ET.  
Our special guest is Ron Branson of jail4judges.org. 
It's an Online TV Show

Corrupt Judges Get Sued

Published on the MEN'S RIGHTS BLOG

Friday, June 17, 2011

Corrupt judges get sued

Los Angeles, CA -- On June 15, at the Los Angeles Law Library, Dennis Ettlin and Daniel Cooper announce the filing of 8 civil law suits against 8 Los Angeles County judges. The 8 civil suits seek $38 million for civil rights violations and damages for prejudice against fathers. The lawsuits highlight judicial bias bought by L.A. County bribes and begin a fourth prong in the campaign to stop judicial bribes in California. The first effort by Judicial Watch succeeded with the Sturgeon I and II cases in getting the bribes ruled un-constitutional. The second effort, on April 13th, was the Judicial Watch demand for District Attorney Steve Cooley to seek the return of $350 million to the county.

The third prong is a legal challenge to void the orders of bribed judges.

The Appellate Court, in its Sturgeon II decision, called for this fourth effort. This first wave of law suits holds the judges personally liable for the loss of constitutional rights and for damages from the specific biases favoring Los Angeles County. All citizens of California are the victims of this “fraud on the court” and the biases perpetrated by judges.

The eight civil lawsuits name 5 L.A. Superior Court judges and 3 Appellate Court judges. Damages are sought for denial of the constitutional rights to due process and for specific damages due to biases in family law, traffic fines,domestic violence and gender discrimination. Our goal is to have a citizen jury re-affirm the illegality of the judicial bribes and to begin the process of compensating the victims. Further info is located at:click here

Original press release:click here

Nicholas Haas Returns To Family Court For Hearing On Motions

On Tuesday December 13^th 2011 between the hours of 8:30 am and 12:30 pm Nicholas Haas will be in the Manchester Family Division 9^th Circuit Court at

35 Amherst Street, Manchester, NH.

People are encouraged to show up with signs and brochures in support of the Haas family. 

There will also be a gathering at the South Elementary School at

88 South Road, Londonderry, NH.  The gathering will be at

8 am.  The gathering will be 200 feet from the school property where the public and hopefully Nick’s daughters arriving to school will see signs in support of their father. 

For more information email Samantha Haas at: samantha_smiles79@hotmail.com.

Recent Changes To Blog - You Can Now Follow Us By Email And Easily Track The Amount Of Page Views

Two recent changes have been made in the format of the blog.  As you will see on the right hand side there is option to “Follow By Email” and an animated counter to track the amount of page views since the beginning of this blog in September 2010.  Now you can get email alerts when new information is posted by signing up for email alerts. 

In addition, we are proud to announce that we are nearing 24,000 page views since the beginning of the blog fourteen months ago.  These unethical people are being exposed. 

Unethical Wall Of Shame Looking To Expand

WANTED

Names To Be Posted To The Unethical “Wall Of Shame”

Do you know of a lawyer, Judge, Marital Master, Guardian Ad Litem or other unethical professional that should be posted on the Unethical “Wall Of Shame” due to their lack of integrity?

Do you know of someone who has failed in their duties to the legal system?

Do you know of someone that is responsible for Judicial Child Abuse?

This is your chance to have a part in exposing corruption.

Here is what you need to do.  Post a response inside this post.  You can post “anonymously” if you wish.  Be truthful in what you say.

1.            Post the person’s full name.

2.            Their title (Judge, Attorney, GAL, etc)

3.            Who they work for and where.

4.            The reason why they should be posted on the Unethical “Wall Of Shame.”

Please make sure you keep your comments clean or your response will not be posted.

Comments And Names Posted Are Purely Opinion And Are Not The Opinion Of This Blog.

Marital Master Philip Cross - Destroying Children - Destroying Families - Destroying Lives (From The Stop Judicial Child Abuse Website)

Marital Master Philip Cross - Destroying Children - Destroying Families - Destroying Lives

Dear Readers,

  This expose was received by the STOP Judicial Child Abuse Blog from a litigant who is suffering at the tyrannical hands of Marital Master Philip Cross, who is under investigatory impeachment by the NH Legislature.  It is reproduced in full, unedited form in black below.

  Please take a moment to read about this Judicial Child Abuser.  Formulate your own opinions and as always, we welcome your feedback!

Sincerely

Stop Judicial Child Abuse

*******************************************************************************

IT TAKES TEN MINUTES TO ASCERTAIN MARITAL MASTER CROSS HAS NO BUSINESS BEING ON ANY BENCH:

·         [Art.] 73. [Tenure of Office To Be Expressed in Commissions; Judges to Hold Office During Good Behavior, etc.; Removal.] The tenure that all commissioned officers shall have by law in their offices shall be expressed in their respective commissions, and all judicial officers duly appointed, commissioned and sworn, shall hold their offices during good behavior except those for whom a different provision is made in this constitution. The governor with consent of the council may remove any commissioned officer for reasonable cause upon the address of both houses of the legislature, provided nevertheless that the cause for removal shall be stated fully and substantially in the address and shall not be a cause which is a sufficient ground for impeachment, and provided further that no officer shall be so removed unless he shall have had an opportunity to be heard in his defense by a joint committee of both houses of the legislature.

Just read the cases of Johnson v. Johnson, Puiia v Miner, Whelen v Emerson, Miller v. Todd, and now Kenick v Kenick:

1. He recommended an order holding a father in criminal contempt following a hearing that had been noticed as a civil contempt hearing, which order resulted in that father, who was representing himself and was the primary custodian of the parties' minor child, to be incarcerated for 10 weeks, in contravention of his right not to be deprived of liberty but by the judgment of his peers, as guaranteed by Part 1, Article 15 of the New Hampshire Constitution.

Town Of Fitzwilliam, NH Recreation Department Coordinator Changes Her Position On Giving Legal And Biological Father A Schedule Of Soccer Games And Information On League Pictures After Dad Emails Towns Administrator Paula Thompson

This article is in regards to yesterdays posting regarding Julie Green the Town of Fitzwilliam, NH Recreation Department Coordinator emailing me and telling me that she could not provide me with a schedule of my son’s games or information on league pictures after I had explained that I am divorced and live out of state.

Green’s response was as follows:

“Unfortunately I am not able to furnish you with information. You will need to go through whatever channels you have set up with your family to acquire these details. It is beyond the scope of my position and authorization to be invoked in personal family matters.

I am sorry that I am not able to help you.”

Is Town Of Fitzwilliam, NH Recreation Department Coordinator Julie Green Responsible For Promoting Parental Alienation Involving An Innocent Eight Year Old Child? – Disturbing Correspondence From Green Telling A Father That He Can Not Have A Schedule Of His Son’s Soccer Games Or Notice Of When And Whom Is Taking League Pictures Of His Son So That He (The Legal And Biological Father) Can Obtain Copies Of His Son’s Yearly Soccer Picture.

I am outraged by an email that I received the other day from Julie Green, the Recreation Department Coordinator of the Town of Fitzwilliam, NH.  I decided to post this email so that others will understand just what alienated parents go through to keep involved in their children’s lives and the numerous hurdles that we have to jump. 

Many people have children who have been alienated by the other parent.  Legally we are their parents and by a divorce decree we have joint decision making but unless the other parent is willing to cooperate, we forfeit our joint decision making as the court seldom enforces this provision in divorce decrees when parents violate it. 

In my case when I went in front of Master David Forrest and raised the issues that my ex wouldn’t communicate anything with me about our children like when they had doctors visits, dentist visits, school activities, sports, summer camp, etc, Master decided to empower her and her attorney Jaye Rancourt and rule that she was doing everything reasonable to keep me informed.  I raised numerous issues with Master in regards to Parental Alienation but again the Master decided that my concerns were meaningless.

Fathers Deserve Equal Protections - A Letter Posted On The Keene Sentinel

Fathers deserve equal protections

(From a letter to the Keene Sentinel)

Posted: Sunday, October 2, 2011 9:00 am

Fathers deserve equal protections

An American tragedy, rarely reported by the media, is how unfairly many divorced fathers are treated in the Family Court.

The court justifies this, claiming to act in the best interests of children. Is it in the best interest of children to put their fathers in jail when Daddy has lost his job, can’t find work, and falls behind in his support payments? Why aren’t the courts flexible, especially in today’s economy?

While it is a father’s responsibility to support his children, it is the court’s execution of this principle that is often so disturbing.

The court’s intransigence can extend to men who are not fathers, too. Recently, DNA proved a man was not the biological father. He was ordered to keep on paying. This is justice?

How Have Individual People Been Dealing With The Loss Of Their Children From Judicial Child Abuse – One Step Mother Tries To Appeal To NH Administrative Judge Edwin W. Kelly – Read Her Story.

The story is all too familiar.  Many of us that have been involved with the NH Family Court System find that it is unfair, unjust and far from unbiased.  It seems that our family court system is destroying our families instead of trying to help them.  Why would that be?

Money seems to be a driving factor in the modern family court system.  This is a multibillion dollar business.  Judges and Marital Masters are employed by family’s misfortunes.  Let’s not forget about the court staff that is also employed in this business.  How about the GAL’s that make money from this system or the therapist that have to be involved in many of these cases.  What about the people that the state employs with DHHS that have jobs collecting the millions of dollars in child support that is court ordered for which federal funds are diverted to the state to employ these people. 

Did I mention the attorneys that litigate these cases too?  Let’s not forget these people.  At fees of $250 and up per hour, how many of these attorneys’s feel the need to keep the litigation to a minimum? 

The NH House Redress Committee and the Sliver of Hope, the Shimmer of Light, will Expose a Corrupt Family Court System or allow us to Embrace and support the hard work of the Judiciary and the other officers of the court.

Two Stories (Read Last Two Post)…………………

One side fights hard so you can hear the story………. Fighting Hard for the Kids that need to be heard and have been hurt by those   …………

That are on the Other Side……

The side that fights hard to make sure you never hear the story ……………

There is yet another side - A side that sees the benefits of the NH Redress Committe and the benefit of oversight for both sides. 

The story of the why the judiciary and officials of the courts would rather hurt the kids, than make decisions that will help them to become the happy, well adjusted, individuals, they deserve an opportunity to be and who will someday become parents themselves.    

Why such extreme differences in opinion when it comes to kids?

Redress Panel Threatens Autonomy Of Three Branches - From The Sunday June 5, 2011 Nashua Telegraph

Sunday, June 5, 2011

Redress panel threatens autonomy of three branches

By EDWIN W. KELLY

Guest Commentary

Our constitution requires that judges be “as impartial as the lot of humanity will admit.” It also provides for three separate branches of government that are as independent of each other “as is consistent with the chain of connection that binds the whole fabric of the constitution in one indissoluble bond of union and amity.”

Curious 18th-century phrases? Or pithy prescriptions for a healthy democracy?

I choose to believe the latter.

The founders called for neither a system of justice where judges were expected to be above the people or perfect in their decisions. Rather, they called for judges who reflected the people, judges as impartial as the lot of humanity will admit.

And recognizing that judges will err, our founders also established the mechanics of judicial review or, in modern parlance, an appellate system.

As for the relationship between and among the branches of government, our state constitution clearly stated that the executive, legislative and judicial branches function as a single unit, but retain strict independence from one another in those areas of government given exclusively to each.

NH: Legislature Holds Impeachment Proceedings for Master in Family Court - From The Fathers And Families Website

NH: Legislature Holds Impeachment Proceedings for Master in Family Court

May 27th, 2011 by Robert Franklin, Esq.

The following was contributed by Fathers and Families Reader, David D. Vandenberg.

Anyone who has been forced to deal with the Alice-in-Wonderland procedures of family courts knows that one enters a totally different world than what we expect American jurisprudence is to be. One federal appellate judge, after reviewing a case in New Hampshire family court stated, “This must be what courts in Bolivia do.”

But it appears that at least one group, the New Hampshire General Court, or legislature, is taking real steps to end the abuse of families in family court. They are impeaching judges and marital masters, who have failed to comply with state and federal statutes and ignored constitutional protections.

Article 8 of the New Hampshire Constitution provides for the Accountability of Magistrates and Officers.  To that end, the legislature, instituted a procedure for the Redress of Grievances. About 150 years ago, this committee was retired, until now.

Stop Judicial Child Abuse - A New Blog About The Abuse Of Children By The Judicial System

This initiative seeks to confront the N.H. Family Court system face-to-face for being the cause in fact of thousands of children being abused and neglected and innumerable families being destroyed by unlawful, illegal, unethical, and rogue court orders.

To access the blog click on Stop Judicial Child Abuse or paste the following link into your web browser:  http://judicialchildabuse.blogspot.com/

When The Courts Won’t Allow Parents To Be Parents And They Negligently Abuse The Same Children They Claim They Are Protecting By Separating Them From Their Parents, What Options Are Left To Communicate With Your Children – Many Parents Just Like Samantha And Nicholas Haas Have To Post Messages Online In Hopes That Their Children Will Some Day Read Their Messages And Realize That It Was Not They Who Choose To Be Separated From Their Children!

Dear AGH & LRH of Londonderry, NH;

The last time you saw your father, it was September 26th 2009.  We have pictures of the two of you, playing at our house that day.

Your dad and I have saved every picture of you, and every year, we contact your school photographer to get your school pictures, just so we can watch you grow.
You are seven and nine years old.  You were five and seven the last time your father could say he loved you.
He fights everyday for you both.  He misses you terribly.
You are too young to understand and too innocent to know.
 
You have done nothing wrong.  You are always loved by us and you need to know that your father never walked away from you.  He grieves in his heart for you both everyday.

With this letter, I can only hope, that you will know, in your hearts, that we will never give up on you.  We love you.

Love,
Samantha Haas (your stepmom)
Hooksett, NH
Ph. 603-858-6634

WMUR Channel Nine News Interviews So Called “Experts To Debate Whether Family Courts Treat Mothers, Fathers Differently” – Unfortunately Channel Nine Never Allows For A “Debate” As The Title Implies - The Only Expert Interviewed Here Appears To Be State Representative Jeffrey Oligny Who Has Been Through The Family Court System Himself – When WMUR Interviews Scott Hampton The Director Of The Business “Ending The Violence.” WMUR Gives Hampton What Appears To Be A Non Rebutted One Sided Interview Of The Bashing Of Men - Hampton In His Interview Would Have People Believe This Is About A Group Of Woman Beating Men That Have Created Their Own Problems And Deserve To Have Their Children Taken Away From Them.

WMUR News Nine in NH aired a special report on Thursday July 28, 2011 in regards to “Fathers Claim NH Courts Biased Against Them.” 

We were all hopeful that Channel Nine News would report on the facts involving reasons why there are so many people speaking out about the NH Family Court System.  After all, last month Thomas Ball set himself on fire in front of the Cheshire County Superior Court (In Cheshire County the Superior Court acts as the family court since the state never funded a separate family division as every other county in the state appears to have done.  This means that the same Judges that hear criminal matters also are dealing with marital matters which are a major conflict).