Information to post on Unethical NH Attorneys, Guardian Ad Litems, Marital Masters, Judges or any other persons involved in "Judicial Child Abuse" or "Judicial Child Neglect." Please email details to nh.unethical.attorney@gmail.com. We will not post your identity or give out your personal information.

Message Board:

We need to keep the pressure on the NH Family Courts by educating the public about the numerous injustices occurring. Please feel free to send us your information for posting. I have not had any recent dealings with the court system so I do not have current information to post. The best way to deal with these unethical judges, guardian ad litems and lawyers is to post as much on them as you can so that people do not want to do business with them. I have personally known judges that have their own practices as most judges are attorneys first. Hit these people where it counts. Their wallets. Starve them out and cut off their funds. When people do not want to use their services, they will have to change their evil ways or be unemployed.

Sunday, June 5, 2011

Do you know of a NH Judge, Marital Master, Attorney or Guardian Ad Litem that is unethical but you are afraid of retaliation if you provide information about this person?

Do you know of a NH Judge, Marital Master, Attorney or Guardian Ad Litem that is unethical but you are afraid of retaliation if you provide information about this person? 

Post anonymously the persons name in this post and their position and whom they are associated with.  The blog staff will investigate this person.  Please provide as much information as possible to assist us in our research.  If you can tell us a little bit about some areas to look into that would be a great help. 

Additional information on the unethical people already posted would also be appreciated. 

Thank you,

Blog Staff


  1. Mary C. White GAL associated with Grafton County Haverhill Family Division
    1. Over billing for services
    2. Documenting false statements from references
    3. Postponing court hearings several times
    4. Sides with one party, and will only contact the other parties witnesses a couple of days before hearing.
    5. Saves voicemails (after purposely agitating other parties to get them to call back feeling angry) from cellphone to present in court without other parties knowledge prior to hearing.
    6. Threatens female school counselor (Lancaster school) to have her job if she does not agree with her (GAL's) recommendations. I had guidance counselor testify under oath to her threats, unfortunately the judge i have could care less.
    7. Lies about kids statements and turns into her words.
    8. Sides with one party at hearing acting as an attorney for other party.

  2. We would really love to hear some more about this GAL as well as the Judge that would not listen.

  3. As a grandparent and going though the court system along with my daughter, want to say, how is 3 weeks enough time for a gal to make a report? How is it that the gals are bias toward one parent and able to be there for the best interest of the child? When you know a person for at least 3 years and know what they are capable of and you tell the gal and they aren't listening. The gal comes along and claim they known this person for many years since he was the gal for their other 2 kids, but they don't know this person for they aren't around them on a daily basics or involved in their life at all except that one time. They meet the other side but won't meet with the other parent side of the family. Saying the other grandparents are nice people and etc.,due to gal meeting them before. Never met us and don't know what kind of grandparents we are. What you tell the gal isn't all in the report either. Told gal that during the time that the parents were together we supported them. The father of the child wouldn't work. But yet the gal says in his report that the father's parents took care of the grandchild. Favorism there and lot of things in there that contrited. Sorry don't think I spelled that right. We are waiting on a ruling as to what parent gets custory. Just hoping the judge sees what the father has been trying to pull. Also there was 2 gals in this case. Father thought the first one didn't do their job. So he had 3 choices and he decided that another gal was needed. Only because he said that coparenting won't work.