Friends,
Please visit http://injust.us/kelleyletter.aspx and submit your letter to Judge Kelley. This is a very important step in exposing the injustices in the family court system. Ed Kelley is charged with the duty of training and overseeing the family division and all of the marital masters that do the state's divorce inc. bidding. HOLD THIS MAN'S FEET TO THE FIRE.
SUBMIT YOUR LETTER TO ED KELLEY
Demand an answer from him as to what HE intends to do about the injustices you have suffered.
DO NOT settle for his suggestion that "you should file a complaint with the judicial conduct committee," or a complaint with the attorney discipline office or with the GAL Board.
Ed Kelley is an employee of the State of New Hampshire. As an employee, he has a job to do. As a member of the Bar, he has professional rules of conduct to obey, and as a judge he has a role to fulfill. HOLD HIM TO ACCOUNT.
Submit your letter at http://injust.us/kelleyletter.aspx
again, this is of pivotal importance.
WE NEED EVERY ONE OF YOUR STORIES. IF YOU HAVE NOT TOLD YOUR STORY YET ***GET TO WORK***
HTTP://INJUST.US/KELLEYLETTER.ASPX
Fight Injustice
I beg of you to please read the following. I have been a victim of judicial injustice, I have lost 12 years of my life and am out over $300,000. I can do nothing about it because of Judicial Immunity. The facts, the truth and the law have not been honored or even considered concerning my case. I have learned that not only does the judicial system endorse lies, false allegation and perjury they encourage and reward them. The following are the details of my child support case, the custody case was far worse. The problem is that I know I am not a lone, sole victim of family court injustice.
ReplyDeleteEaont County Michigan erased$60,000 of a fathers child support arrearage based upon poven fraudulent petitions. The Court of appeals and the Supreme Court upheld the decision.
JUDICIAL IMMUNITY MUST BE ABOLISHED.
Dale Karin Trowbridge, resident of Michigan.
Eaton County LC # 90-1208-DS
COA# 301265 Denied "lack of merit"
SUPREME COURT# 143310 denied "not prsauded"
STATEMENT OF FACTS –
June 14, 1991, A final order of support was entered granting me (the mother) sole care, custody and control of minor child dob 8-1-89. The father was ordered to pay $130 a week; $75 child support and $35 childcare.
The order quotes: Section 552.531MCL ‘That a child support Judgment on and after the date each support payment if due, with the full force, effect, and attributes of a Judgment of this state, and is not, on and after the date it is due, subject to retroactive modification.
August 26, 1991 the father files a proven (with evidence) FRAUDULENT petition for child support modification. He alleged that his VA benefits had been terminated.
FRAUD ON THE COURT
Written law requires a change of circumstance in order to file a motion for child support reduction within 2 – 3years window.
(The FOC sent out new income forms, childcare forms, etc. to recalculate child support. I filled out the forms and sent them back to the FOC. A new recommendation was generated for $79 a week child support ($4) higher than the original and -0- childcare. I called the FOC why childcare was -0- and never received a return call. I worked full time plus overtime at General Motors, my child was 2 years old and childcare had already been verified with the original order of support. I never heard anything from the father or the Court thereafter. I assumed the father had dropped it since his actual weekly support would have increased by 4.00.)
December 7,1999 the father filed a (proven with evidence) FRAUDULENT ex-parte change of custody petition. The father had rarely been in my daughters’ life and was $54,000 in child support arrearage.
FRAUD ON THE COURT
December 8, 1999 the Judge granted to father custody. I had absolutely no input nor did I even know there had been any allegations made against me. There had never been any allegations made against me prior to December 8th.
BY LAW IT IS NECESSARY TO HAVE AN EVIDENCIARY HEARING WHERE THE ACCUSER MUST PROVE HIS ALLEGATIONS – THERE WAS NEVER AN EVIDENCIARY HEARING, ILLEGAL!!!!
I did however prove all of the allegations to be lies with evidence. I also suggested that the reason he may have wanted custody of my daughter could be retroactive dependent child support of approximately $25,000 and monthly benefits thereafter. The father had FRAUDULENTLY filled out his income forms (December 1999) stating that his only income was GM retirement and VA benefits.
May 2000 a court employee discovered that the father had been accepted to Social Security benefits October of 1999. Proof the father wanted the child for dependent SS benefits. The retroactive amount of $25,000 and monthly benefits thereafter could only be sent to the address at which the child resides. The Court could not obtain it to put towards his $54,000 of child support arrearage.
From December 7, 1999 the father had lied about everything, all proven with evidence.
FRAUD ON THE COURT
to be contined
October 2000, custody hearing in front of the Judge, the father when asked about his $54,000 of child support arrearage testified that “this is not about money, I have said this is not and will not be about money.” “If that’s the figure you come up with then I’ll pay it.” He testified to having full knowledge that he was ordered to pay $130 a week in child support and that he had no problem with the ordered amount.
ReplyDeleteLater in the hearing the Judge asked the father if he had ever filed a motion to have his child support lowered.
The father “I didn’t – no didn’t argue the $130.”
Judge “All right, so, as far as any Oder was concerned, it was $130 a week?”
Father “Right.
Then the Judge informed him that he had filed a motion (the fraudulent motion) in August of 1991 and that there was a subsequent recommendation of $79.
The father “No I hadn’t.”
The Judge told him that he was looking at the petition.
Father “Say what? In ‘91 I asked to have it be reduced?”
“Yes you did.”
“I don’t remember that?”
“You don’t remember that?”
“No.”
“And there was a subsequent recommendation by the FOC in March of 1991 that said you should pay $79 a week.”
“I don’t remember in’91 asking that.”
April 19, 2001 the father filed another FRAUDULENT petition claiming that he had never known he had been ordered to pay $130 a week. That he had thought the subsequent recommendation of $79 was an order.
FRAUD ON THE COURT
I provided the pages from the transcript to the court proving the fraud but the Court allowed him to be heard on his proven fraudulent petition.
However the Judge did order that the Defendant had to supply factual and complete income statements or that he would not consider going back and make any changes.
September 7, 2003 The Court employees recommendation stated that the father had provided the FOC with altered tax documents and an incomplete statement from VA that was not consistent with the previous statement he had provided to the FOC.
FRAUD ON THE COURT
to be continued
I subpoenaed all of the fathers incomes proving that the father’s claimed incomes (fraudulent incomes) were anywhere from $4,569 up to $15,383 LESS per year than what he had actually made. (A grand total of $70,633 for the years 1992 – 2003.) The VA statement proved without a doubt that his VA benefits had not been terminated for one day. Proving the father’s perjury “My VA benefits were cut for 18 to 24 months and I can prove it.” And “ My VA benefits were cut for 6 months and I provided proof to the FOC.” Proving his 1991 petition fraudulent.
ReplyDeletePERJURY, FALSE ALLEGATIONS, FRAUD ON THE COURT
I, through counsel, to have the father’s 1991 fraudulent petition dismissed and his subsequent fraudulent petition dismissed for the above reasons plus more.
The Judge determined that it would be fair to recalculate the year by year calculations using the subpoenaed records I obtained and paid for.
It is now the year 2005 and I had not always claimed childcare on my income tax, however I did my best to prove childcare expenses. I provided the FOC with daily work records proving that I worked full time plus overtime. I had (3) childcare providers from 1992 – 1999 write letters verifying that they had provided care and the amount they were paid. Plus my 1992 childcare provider testified in Court. There was no allegation made that I did not have childcare expenses. In fact in the father’s fraudulent 1991 petition it stated how I was gainfully employed.
FOC recommendation for year 1992 only, it was ordered by the Court to do year by year calculations. The Court employee stated that I had given her no verification of childcare, therefore she didn’t consider it. Recommendation exactly the same as she had written in 1992 - $79 child support and -0- childcare.
FRAUD ON THE COURT BY THE COURT EMPLOYEE
September 4, 2007, the Judge issued his final opinion and order stating that the only verification of childcare was one witness and that he did not find her to be a credible witness therefore denying me any childcare reimbursement. Clearly I had provided an overwhelming amount of childcare verification. I had proven, with evidence, all of the father’s lies, perjury, false allegations and false petitions.
FRAUD ON THE COURT
But the Judge determines that the childcare witness is not “credible”.
Law states that you MUST have a change of circumstance to file for child support reduction within 2 -3 year window. The 1991 fraudulent petition was filed 2 months after the original order of support. The second recommendation proves that he had no change in circumstance, if anything he had an increase of income. THERE WAS NO ALLEGATION OF ME HAVING NO CHILDCARE.
The end result the Court erased over $60,000 of the fathers child support arrearage placing me owing him over $18,000 in overpayment which the Court is illegally collecting from me through the child support system. Stating that I am “severely behind in child support” I have never been ordered to pay child support in my life.
I was forced to file bankruptcy and lost my home of 18 years. While collecting information for my bankruptcy I came across my 1992 income tax return and found that I had claimed childcare form 2441. I never checked because I knew I hadn’t claimed childcare quite often plus I did not believe the Court Employee would lie. I also provided an affidavit from a VA attorney stating that the attached statement (the yearly statement I had subpoenaed) was factual and accurate and the VA disability are lifelong benefits and are not subject to termination per federal law.
FRAUD ON THE COURT
I filed a new petition with the 2441 attached, the Judge denied my petition.
ReplyDeleteI filed a case with the Court of Appeals, response “lack of merit.”
I filed a case with the Supreme Court, response “Not persuaded.”
LAWS -
MCR 2.612 ( c)(1) (a) Mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect. (B) Newly
discovered evidence...( c) Fraud (intrinsic or extrinsic), misrepresentation, or other misconduct
of an adverse party.
MCR 2.2612 (A)(1) states that the Court may correct clerical mistakes, oversight or omissions at
any time.
MCR2.612 (2) states: the motion must be made within a reasonable time. (3) This subrule does
not limit the power of a court to entertain an independent action to relieve a party from a
judgment, order of proceeding; (B) or to set aside a judgment for fraud on the court.
Case laws Zammitt v Zammitt and Thornton v Thornton, case # 270931, January 3, 2008. There must be a change of circumstance to file for child support modification/review within 2- 3year window.
Thornton v Thornton - The Court of Appeals concluded that the "trial court erred when it modified plaintiff’s award of spousal support without adequate record evidence and definite factual findings. Therefore, we reverse the trial court’s opinion...." "Evidence of the claimed changed circumstances must appear in the record" (Rappaport v Rappaport) The Court of Appeals orders "Therefore, we vacate the trial court’s order modifying defendant’s spousal support obligation and remand this matter to the trial court. On remand, the trial court shall take evidence concerning the parties finances and the necessary findings of fact.
MCR 2.612 (1)( c) Fraud (intrinsic or extrinsic), misrepresentation, or other misconduct of
an adverse party.
MCR 2.612(2)(3) and (b) or to set aside a judgment for FRAUD ON THE COURT.
The fathers August 26, 1991 petition was and is FRAUDULENT. The Affidavit from VA
Attorney Thomas K. Maher and attached subpoenaed statement proves this fact. The fathers April 19, 2001 petition was and is FRAUDULENT proven by his under oath testimony October 2000. Plus many more petitions filed by the father were proven to be FRAUDULENT.
MCR 2.612(2)(3) and (b) or to set aside a judgment for fraud on the Court.
The only change of circumstance the Defendant had in his petition was that his VA benefits
had been terminated. The Defendant had No change in circumstance. He clearly had no
evidence of changed circumstance in record.
Fact, The Appellant had proven with evidence an overwhelming amount of lies and
perjury committed by the Appellee. The Appellant proved with evidence that the
Appellee/Defendant had supplied the FOC with fraudulent income documents. And foremost
the Appellant proved with evidence that the Appellee’s petitions were and are fraudulent.
Fact, The Appellee/Defendant has not presented one piece, one shred of evidence to
Support his case. Nor has the FOC or Court system presented me with any evidence to justify
their decisions and orders, they refuse to, stating they don’t have to.
JUDICIAL IMMUNITY MUST BE ABOLISHED!!!! IT IS UNCONSTUTIONAL AND A VIOLATION OF AN INDIVIDULES CIVIL RIGHT TO JUSTICE. WE ARE ALL CREATED EQUAL – UNLESS YOU’RE A JUDGE.
My appeal with the Supreme Court was denied October 24, 2011. Judicial injustice must be exposed!!!! Please help expose the Court system before more innocent children and good parents are emotionally, mentally and financially destroyed. I have posted brief details of my child custody and child support cases on the “should a parents health be……, Anderson Cooper, comment” Parts 1 -14.
Somebody who can make a difference must care.
Dale Karin Trowbridge
trowbridge.dale@yahoo.com
The Judicial system not only endoses lies, false petitions and perjury they encourage and reward it.
ReplyDeleteNH sucks and that's just the beginning. We moved here for more liberty and less restriction and we lost both.
ReplyDeleteNH is the saddest joke I know and the Derry No Family Court and it's worthless judges are the second saddest joke.
Delete