COMMENTS FROM THE ARTICLE POSTED TO THE CONCORD MONITOR
: if the marital master forces you into supervised visitation (at $60 an hour), in an agency run by the MOTHER'S lawyer?
: when you know that the marital master is being paid by the child support collection agency?
: when the marital master refuses to let you present evidence or witnesses?
Report infractions to the administrative judge (Ed. Kelly) who's known for lying to protect the profits accruing to the courts?
File a complaint with the state Supreme Court, which signed the agreement to accept money from the (Executive Branch) Child Support Collection Agency?
Our founding fathers were wise enough to assume that the courts would become corrupt if not controlled, and provided a means of holding them accountable. The time to use that (CONSTITUTIONAL) protection has long since arrived. The Communist revolutionaries in NH are saying that the Constitution is old and out dated, but this situation proves them wrong. The court will not police itself, so the other branches have to step in and keep them honest. Forget the spineless toadies in the Executive branch. That leaves only the Legislative branch to provide Justice in NH.
No-one else cares about the abuses carried out by our system. The Judicial conduct committee won't do anything. They stand by their own, the same way the Attorney Discipline System stands by it's own AND the Administrative Appeal's Unit stand's by it's own. Our Constitution gives us the right of Redress when we've been abused by the system. The right the Democrat's took away while they ran the state. The Redress Grievance Committee is a part of our Constitution, to keep our government in check.
Is it legal and ethical for a Judge to deny evidence which proves innocence? What about a Judge who grant's adoption illegally, without terminating the father's right's? What about a Judge who denies a father paternity testing? What about the Probate Judge who writes lies in his decision, ignoring testimony and evidence in court and terminates a parent's right's unlawfully? And the Supreme Court is no better. They go right along with the lies of the Probate Judge.How about the Judge who states, "it's too bad if your child was taken illegally. It's too late because you didn't file a De Novo appeal." Are you aware parent's aren't even told they can file this appeal and the parent's who know about it are refused by their court appointed puppet's, who state the court is their boss. The same puppet's that the NH Judges refuse to let the parent fire?
All this corruption start's with Judge Kelly and goes up the ladder from there. So yes, I am extremely proud the Redress Grievance Committee. No-one else will look out for the people of NH. We voted the right people into office! They are working for us. Not the corrupt court's!
The Bill of Address hearings involved a nearly 50/50 combination of men and women, not a bunch of angry men.
Cross caused me to spend ten weeks in jail to produce money I didn't have or owe in child support, after my Attorney filed Findings of Facts and Rulings of Law, three times, yet Master Cross ignored each.
The specific appeals mentioned by the authors never happened.
The lawmakers behind the impeachment effort are there for the fact that a Marital Master is not allowed to hold a Criminal Contempt hearing, lie, call it a Civil Contempt Hearing, and jail me while I had the majority of custodial time and the same income as my ex-wife.
The evidence that Cross prevented was the DCYF and HHS Ombudsman's reports proving that it was the mother who was harming the Child.
Where is the mention of the fact that the Child's PCP and Therapist each appeared in Court to get the Child home to her father after her mother willfully disobeyed the Doctors causing enormous health problems?
Or there is assigning a GAL, who previously worked for my ex and said, "I don't like what you do for a living" in the hour I was allowed with him, the one who NEVETR checked any of the references I gave him.
Or how about being ordered to therapy even after 2 separate independent ones said it was not needed and would be fraud to charge my insurance for it. Only to be sent to one by name whose license was "terminated" by the state. Take a guess what Judge Kelly's wife does for a living.
The "story" fails to point out, that the court put out a warrant for David Johnson in an attempt to prevent him from testifying to the legislature, dragging him out of the hearing.
If Kelly can clean up his corrupt courts, maybe there wouldn't be any need for such legislation, just ask him how many cases are reviewed for accuracy and what the criteria would be to do so.
– C. dog: blissfully free of contractual companionship, but regularly enjoys free association with females