Blog Reaches 25,000 Page Views Today

Today the blog has recorded over 25,000 page views in a little over a year.  Wow!  It's like a train picking up momentum.  Once the train picks up speed don’t get in the way.  Get on board or be run over.  Be ethical when you are a public servant or be exposed by this blog. 

There is so much corruption out there that needs to be exposed and we doing it. 

We are reaching out to and informing lots of readers about issues involving Judicial Child Abuse and Neglect.  We are exposing unethical abusers of the court system and proud of our work.

Help to keep up the momentum.  Keep your tips coming in on unethical attorneys, GAL’s, Judges, Marital Masters or anyone else that is participating in Judicial Child Abuse or Judicial Child Neglect. 

OK Legislator Blasts Family Law System; F & F’s Gregory Tells Committee ‘We Need Shared Parenting’ - From The "Fathers And Families" Website

OK Legislator Blasts Family Law System; F & F’s Gregory Tells Committee ‘We Need Shared Parenting’

November 8th, 2011 by Glenn Sacks, MA, Executive Director

An adult child of divorce, Rep. Jason Nelson criticized the courts for marginalizing his father.

Fathers and Families member Chris Gregory, a Marine combat veteran of Desert Storm and Somalia, recently told an Oklahoma House of Representatives committee that the family law system is rife with injustices and often separates children from the fathers they love and need.

Led by Representative Mark McCullough and Representative Jason Nelson, the Oklahoma House of Representatives conducted an interim study on family law and no fault divorce earlier this month. According to the legislators’ press release here, “Oklahoma’s family law is dangerously failing the children it is supposed to protect, leading some lawmakers to consider reform of both divorce statutes and the foster-care system.”

Who In The World Is Ed Mosca? - From The Website Of NH Corruption Watch

Who in the world is Ed Mosca?

Just who is Ed Mosca? Well, a quick glance at his caseload will reveal that he is not in very high demand as a lawyer. He typically handles N.H. Bar referrals of low-income litigants typically fighting for "big purses." He often works on contingency and a look into some of his motion practice, reveals that he is apparently not very intelligent.

One of his former clients reports that he "bailed out" at the last minute before a hearing, leaving the client "high and dry." This type of unethical behavior is evidently not uncharacteristic of Ed Mosca.
In another case, apparently Ed Mosca has engaged in unethical behavior that has put him on the hot-seat before a Family Court for alleged contempt practices and violations of the N.H. Professional Rules of Conduct.

Now, as counsel to the N.H. General Court, Ed Mosca has apparently brought his inane and disingenuous antics to the State House.

N.H. Corruption Watch will be keeping a close eye on Ed Mosca, and will be sharing its findings relative to his practices and conduct as information become available.

In the mean time, email nh.corruption.watch@gmail.com.


Eric Davidson
N.H. Corruption Watch

Man Seeks Restitution From Ex-Wife In Fraud Case - From Citizen.Com

Man seeks restitution from ex-wife in fraud case - citizen.com: Laconia: laconia, new hampton, belknap county superior court,

Man seeks restitution from ex-wife in fraud case

By BEA LEWIS blewis@citizen.com | Posted: Monday, November 21, 2011 6:00 am

LACONIA — A New Hampton man says he feels victimized by his ex-wife as well as the justice system.

David Prutzanni, 56, of 714 Straights Rd., New Hampton, claims in documents on file at the Belknap County Superior Court in Laconia that his now-ex-wife fraudulently signed his name to numerous checks, stealing $86,000 from a home equity line of credit and an additional $14,000 in cash from his personal checking account. He alleges she used the bulk of the money to buy drugs.

Prutzanni’s ex-wife, JeanMarie Leonard, 52, of Laconia, was indicted in April on a Class B felony charge of forgery. The state charged that, in October 2005, she executed a written home equity line of credit agreement, disclosure statement and note by signing Prutzanni’s signature without his authorization and that her intent was to defraud.

Join the Cause Against Judicial Corruption

(From the "Defend Yourself" blog)

One click to say you want HONESTY in government.

Also below these reports join and watch an important show on Nov. 20th.
Check it out.

Corruption Reports

Sexual Misconduct
Criminal Acts
Perjury
Search All Reports
U.S. Senators
U.S. Congressmen
Governors
Mayors
Judges
Law Enforcement

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Ron Branson on Lawless America Show -- Sunday November 20, 2011 - 5-7 pm ET

Thursday, 17 November 2011 00:00

William M. Windsor

The Lawless America Government Corruption Crisis Online TV Show will be held Sunday November 20, 2011 from 5 to 7 pm ET.  
Our special guest is Ron Branson of jail4judges.org. 
It's an Online TV Show

Marital Master Philip Cross - Destroying Children - Destroying Families - Destroying Lives (From The Stop Judicial Child Abuse Website)

Marital Master Philip Cross - Destroying Children - Destroying Families - Destroying Lives

Dear Readers,

  This expose was received by the STOP Judicial Child Abuse Blog from a litigant who is suffering at the tyrannical hands of Marital Master Philip Cross, who is under investigatory impeachment by the NH Legislature.  It is reproduced in full, unedited form in black below.

  Please take a moment to read about this Judicial Child Abuser.  Formulate your own opinions and as always, we welcome your feedback!

Sincerely

Stop Judicial Child Abuse

*******************************************************************************

IT TAKES TEN MINUTES TO ASCERTAIN MARITAL MASTER CROSS HAS NO BUSINESS BEING ON ANY BENCH:

·         [Art.] 73. [Tenure of Office To Be Expressed in Commissions; Judges to Hold Office During Good Behavior, etc.; Removal.] The tenure that all commissioned officers shall have by law in their offices shall be expressed in their respective commissions, and all judicial officers duly appointed, commissioned and sworn, shall hold their offices during good behavior except those for whom a different provision is made in this constitution. The governor with consent of the council may remove any commissioned officer for reasonable cause upon the address of both houses of the legislature, provided nevertheless that the cause for removal shall be stated fully and substantially in the address and shall not be a cause which is a sufficient ground for impeachment, and provided further that no officer shall be so removed unless he shall have had an opportunity to be heard in his defense by a joint committee of both houses of the legislature.

Just read the cases of Johnson v. Johnson, Puiia v Miner, Whelen v Emerson, Miller v. Todd, and now Kenick v Kenick:

1. He recommended an order holding a father in criminal contempt following a hearing that had been noticed as a civil contempt hearing, which order resulted in that father, who was representing himself and was the primary custodian of the parties' minor child, to be incarcerated for 10 weeks, in contravention of his right not to be deprived of liberty but by the judgment of his peers, as guaranteed by Part 1, Article 15 of the New Hampshire Constitution.

Govabuse Is Holding Nationwide Protest On Family Court System Friday August 12, 2011 – See Below To Go To Their Website For Details And On How You Can Participate

Govabuse Nationwide Protest

“Government Abuse IS Child Abuse for Profit”  

When:  Friday, August 12, 2011        

Where: See State/PLC tab for your area

Who: United States- Child/Family Rights Groups

Why:“We the People”
                        are no longer tolerating;

·        Unjust Laws

·    TAXPAYER dollars (billions) used to separate, and financially demolish families.

We the People” demand reformation of:

·        OUR FAMILY COURT SYSTEMS including:

·        Assigned Judges- (must be abolished)

·        Court Appointed Guardian-ad-litem

(must be abolished-severely limited at a minimum)

·        Family courts / records must be made public

·        Court Gag orders are a violation of 1^st amendment

·        Adoption incentive payments (must be abolished)

Re; Adoption / Safe Families Act 1997

Every effort must be made for children to stay with Grandparents / family members instead of foster care.

·        Grandparents / family must have visitation rights without current criminal treatment

·        Families must be given assistance instead of removing their

Children example; removal due to gas shut-off

·        Parents must be restored freedoms to raise their children

·        Immediate access in all cases for children’s records

·        Option to have a Jury, when requested in family courts

We the People” demand reformation of:

OUR FAMILY COURT SYSTEM including:

Assigned Judges- must be abolished

·        We are stripped of our right to elect public servants (judges)

·        Assigned judges cannot be voted out of office as they are ‘assigned’ to hear cases after pretending to retire. 

·        They have zero incentive to administer justice or follow law or legal procedures because they cannot be voted out of office after they ‘retire’ THEREFORE, we have been stripped of our legal right to elect (vote) for our judges

·         Assigned judges  are ‘DOUBLE-DIPPING’.  Pretend to ‘retire’  

but are assigned to family court cases, collecting approx; $485.00 per ‘day’ while collecting their retirement pay- all paid by taxpayers

·        Court appointed guardian-ad-litem / advocate for child / lawyer for child

·        Child Protective Services aka; CPS/ DHS / DFS/DSS/Foster Care and Adoption Services

Click Here To Go To Govabuse Website!

NEW HAMPSHIRE                        

COUNTY:         MERRIMACK

PLC:                  Bobby Dickerson  

E-MAIL:           mailto:nhbdickerson@govabuse.org?subject=Protest Information

PROTEST         NEW HAMPSHIRE STATE CAPITOL

LOCATION:    

                             Concord, New Hampshire

Directions to Capitol;

http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/misc/directions/

---

NEW HAMPSHIRE                        

COUNTY:          HILLSBOROUGH

 PLC:                  Dorothy Knightly 

 E-MAIL:           mailto:nhdknightly@govabuse.org?subject=Protest Information

PROTEST         Hillsborough Probate Court

LOCATION:     #30 Spring Street

                   Nashua, New Hampshire 03061-0387

Family Court In NH Is A Joke – Marital Master David Forrest Is The Ringmaster Of A Three Ring Circus

In Master Forest’s Three Ring Circus first comes the bickering, his deciphering and then men’s suffering. 

In looking back at my divorce file I noted a lot of things that were interesting.  My Alienated children can someday look back at what Forrest did to them and thank Forrest for devaluing their father and empowering their mother, an Alienating parent who thinks of her needs over her children’s needs.  I have records in a safe place and someday when my kids are older, I will let them look through the records so that they can learn the real truth and not the lies that their mother has filled their minds with. 

First of all Forrest made a lot of decisions on hearsay and testimony with no evidence presented.  Keep in mind that in a divorce, the burden of proof is the preponderance of evidence.  Not proof beyond the reason of doubt.  What does this translate into?  Whoever has the better story and who ever is more believable wins.  The burden of preponderance of evidence gives people like Forrest too much leeway and too much power.  They can totally ruin a person if they see fit to.  For the common person you don’t have the resources to fight it.  It is so costly you will end up bankrupt before your divorce is done and plan on a two year fight.  This is the atmosphere that Forrest encourages.  He like conflict.  I think he feels empowered by it. 

An example of Forrest poor judgment is, my ex told Forrest that she paid for my $10k college loan and told Forrest that I didn’t work much.  He liked her story.  She provided no physical evidence.  Just her testimony.  Forrest in his decision stated he believed what my ex-wife had said. He took her word over mine.  Why? He is a biased man hating pig.   I told Forrest when I testified that I have records that prove my ex was lying. 

I have records from the government showing that I paid off most of my loans prior to our marriage and the government paid off most of the rest when Bill Clinton signed a law reimbursing police officers on their student loans for service as a full time cop.  I brought this up to Forrest at the hearing but he decided that I was lying and took my ex wife’s testimony as gospel.  Call me a liar now Forrest.  I have your written decision and I have the records in my possession and can prove what I say is true. 

I also have my statements from SSN. When I was married, I made more money then my ex did.  How is that possible for a low life blood sucking leach that Forrest portrayed me out to be?  In his decision he portrays me out to be a man whore that worked part time and was unemployed most of the time when in fact I worked long hours with lots of overtime to support my ex wife’s spending habits.  Oh that’s right, my ex told him I was a deadbeat husband and again he believed her. 

When I questioned my ex in court, I caught her in several lies.  She testified that she never called State Police on me.  I provided Forrest a State Police Report where my ex called and spoke with a Trooper inquiring how she could legally get me out of the house.  The Trooper asked if I was abusive to her or the kids in which she stated no that I was not.  The trooper told her there was nothing he could do for her.  My ex’s response was that was what her attorney told her (This was her second attorney and not Jaye Rancourt). 

I had to deal with this kind of crap and maintain my job as a cop at the same time.  Forrest should have given me a medal for being able to deal with my while maintaining my job.  My ex totally denied that it was her who called this Trooper and spoke with him.  My ex in my opinion is sick but let me tell you, she knew what she was doing.  Her moves were calculated. 

If you are going through a divorce, learn about personality disorders.  Many people have them.  If you can learn about personality disorders, it may help with your situation if you can understand what you’re dealing with. 

Just remember, a system that allows a person like Forrest to make decisions on the preponderance of evidence is bound to fail.  People like Forrest abuse their power.  If you have a contested divorce in front of Forrest and you are a man, I would recommend that you ask him to recuse himself from the case due to his being biased.  Forrest does not have the ability to be fair to men.  I have had numerous people contact me because of this blog and they tell me their stories of how Forrest abused them and condoned giving full custody of their children to the alienating parent.  I hope that my stories about Forrest unethical behavior will help others to deal with their divorce and custody issues.  Anyone wanting to contact me with their stories or for assistance can be assured that I will keep there identity anonymous. 

Cheshire County Judge John P. Arnold and Marital Master David S. Forrest Fail Surveys On The Courthouse Forum!

It’s pathetic that we have Judge’s and Marital Masters in Cheshire County that rate so poor on surveys.  The NH Judicial system needs a reform.  It’s too bad we can’t vote these people out of office like they do in other states.  

If you go to the Courthouse Forum with the following link:

http://www.courthouseforum.com///forums/directory.php?letter=a

You will be on a page that has Judge John P. Arnold’s score.  Arnold received a D- rating. 

Click on the F tab to go to Forrest.  He rated slightly better with a D+. 

It is no wonder why Cheshire County Superior Court has so many issues when it comes to the marital division.  Please go to the Courthouse Forum and take the survey. 

An Example On How Attorney Douglas A Thornton of Surry NH Unethically Runs His Law Practice – He Prides Himself On Being A Guardian Ad Litem That Is Smarter Than An Eight Year Old!

I recall speaking with Attorney Douglas A. Thornton of Surry NH, during my divorce.  He was the court appointed Guardian Ad Litem.  I repeatedly told him that my ex-wife was doing everything in her power to alienate the children from me.  I explained how she was making things up and that she was using the kids against me.  Thornton doesn’t believe in Parent Alienation. 

Thornton I remember told me that he was smarter than an eight year old (my oldest son’s age) and knew how to question him to get his answers.  Maybe Doug Thornton can go on the show “Are You Smarter Than a Fifth Grader.”  It would be truly amusing. 

Doug Thornton questioned my sons alright.  He played right into my ex-wife’s warped mind and got all the wrong answers.  As I posted in a previous article, my ex-wife, the one who in my “opinion” has multiple personality disorders.  Thornton was told by my attorney that there were counseling records obtained in discovery from my ex-wife and in our opinions, she was diagnosed with multiple personality disorders and was refusing to be treated.  I remember Thornton’s response all too well.  He said that the records came too late for him to consider them for his findings and he also didn’t have the expertise to interpret them.  Shame on Doug Thornton!  It was his job as GAL to look into the counseling records.  His actions aided my ex-wife in alienating the children from me.  He is incompetent as a GAL and an attorney and should be disbarred. 

I remember listening to Doug Thornton in court speaking to one of the court officers and making a joke of his job.  He said that he had a good routine.  As a GAL he was paid by divorcing parties and as a bankruptcy attorney, he would get paid by these same people at a later time when they had to file bankruptcy.  Does this sound unethical? 

Doug Thornton approached me in court after this comment and asked about the remainder of my bill that I owed him.  I owed him a small amount of money.  I explained I was doing my best but had been experiencing extreme financial hardship.  I had noticed in documents that my ex-wife had paid Thornton very little and she owed him a considerable amount of money.  When I asked him if he would work with me he became irate and threatened to bring me to court and to have me found in contempt of court.  I stated to him that my ex-wife according to his records had hardly paid him and he said that was none of my business. 

I realized some months after my divorce was finalized and I had paid Thornton’s bill that I had no records to show that my debt was paid.  I contacted Thornton and asked him for a final statement.  He became irate with me. 

Below is the first and second email I sent him politely asking for a statement.  Read the emails from the bottom up to follow the conversation.   All correspondence has my name blacked out to protect my minor children.  Read from the bottom to the top to follow the conversation. 

Thornton responds after the second request and states he is busy and is avoids the request.  I then send him another email telling him that I find it ridiculous that he billed over $5,000 for his services and can’t understand why I can’t get a statement.  Thornton then accuses me of throwing my weight around as a police officer.  I have to email him back and tell him I am no longer working as a police officer.  Read the email below and start from the bottom and read to the top. 

So after this bullying email from Doug Thornton, he writes me a letter and sends it to me in PDF format.  He asks me to give this to my current attorney.  I find the third and fourth paragraph disturbing. 

In the third paragraph, Thornton justifies not giving me a final statement since in the past I questioned why he was singling me out and telling me he was going to file court action against me for owing a few hundred dollars when my ex-wife owed him thousands of dollars.  Thornton states that he makes no determination whether it is profitable to pursue fees and he knows of no law that requires him to spend time to collect on a bad debt.  I know I paid Thornton in full.  What does he mean by this?  It appears to me that he may have overbilled me and is letting my ex-wife get away without paying.  Do you see a problem with this.  A GAL that would do this is UNETHICAL. 

In the fourth paragraph, Thornton defends himself as I had stated to him that I had counsel (Which my counsel was dealing with some post divorce issues and wanted me to get up to date records).  I never told him what the counsel was for.  He made an assumption it was to file a lawsuit against him.  Why would Thornton think this way?  From my experiences it’s because he did something wrong.  See the letter below.

So now that you have the facts, do you think this attorney is unethical?  Do you think he has something to hide?  You definitely do not want to give this guy any business.  He will do to you what he did to me.  I feel like he robbed me blind.  As a GAL My opinion is that he is incompetent.  I have had specialized training on questioning children.  When I asked Thornton on the witness stand if he had any training on forensic questioning of children he said no.  I believe it.  So what do you think?  Is Douglas A Thornton smarter than an eight year old?

What Can You Do To Deal With Unethical Attorney’s, GAL’s Judges and Marital Masters?

I use to be a full time police officer.  During my years of experiences in law enforcement, I went up against a lot of attorneys.  When I was police prosecutor I dealt with a lot of attorneys.  Some attorneys were very ethical and good and others not so ethical.  I never took it personal when I lost a case to an attorney doing their job and being ethical and proper.  What I always had an issue with is unethical attorneys that will lie and cheat.

Now that you have some background let me begin by telling you the most important thing you can do to deal with unethical attorneys like Jaye Rancourt of Manchester, NH, and Doug Thornton of Surry, NH as well as Marital Masters like David Forrest and Judges like John P. Arnold is to hold them accountable by getting your information out there in the public.  I always liked to use the following scenario with subordinate officers.  I would hold my pen up and tell my subordinates, “See this.”  I would then point to my firearm and say to them that this pen in my hand has more power then the firearm I was carrying.  Here is my point.

1. Blog about these people.  You can search for blogs and other forums by doing a Google Search.  You can create your own blog for free.  The Courthouse Forum is a good place to post information about Judges and Marital Masters (http://www.courthouseforum.com/).  Another recent blog I found was NH Judges Are Sodomites at http://nhjudgesaresodomites.blogspot.com/.  Let others know how and why these people are problematic.  Take away their business by making others want to not do business with them.  With the internet you can reach out to a lot of people.  What is one of the first things I do when I want to know about a person or company that I am thinking of doing business with?  I Google their name to see what information is available.  I decide to do business with them or not to do business with them based on my research.  Just make sure you are giving accurate information about these people and be professional.  Don’t make up false information about these people.  Just stick to the record which usually speaks for itself and gives credibility to what you have to say. 

2. File complaints against these people through the appropriate agencies.  In NH, you can file complaints with numerous agencies. 
1. For judges and marital masters you can file a complaint with the Judicial Conduct Committee.  Information is available at the following link: http://www.courts.state.nh.us/committees/judconductcomm/index.htm
2. For attorneys, you can file a complaint with the Judicial Conduct Committee.  Information is available at the following link: http://www.courts.state.nh.us/committees/attydiscip/
3. If the attorney is providing a service to you the Better Business Bureau is another avenue.  I am going to try this with the GAL since he provided me a service and there were lots of issues while doing so (This will be outlined in another post in the near future).
4. For GAL’s you can file a complaint with the Guardian Ad Litem Board in NH at http://www.nh.gov/gal/complaints.htm.  The real joke about this is that it cost to file a complaint.  This is a direct quote from the website, “The complaint filing fee in the form of a valid check or money order made out to “The State of New Hampshire: GAL Board.” The fee is $100.”  Most people that have been screwed by incompetent GAL’s can’t afford the money to file the complaint which is true in my case.  Amazing, the government is charging for services that should be covered by our taxes.  Is there a problem here?  Can you say discrimination? 

3. Contact the media and see if they will interview you or write an opinion letter to the editor.  I recently saw two articles in the Keene Sentinel where one person did just this.  If you go to his website NH Judges Are Sodomites at the following link you can read them at http://nhjudgesaresodomites.blogspot.com/2010/10/cheshire-superior-court-holding.html and http://nhjudgesaresodomites.blogspot.com/2010/10/cheshire-superior-court-rapes-divorce.html

4. Contact your state politicians and tell them that their state is screwed up and they need to work towards fixing it.  I’m not hopeful that they will listen but it’s a great way to vent. 

These are just some of the things you can do.  The important thing is to get your information out in the public.  If anyone has more suggestion please by all means post them.  If you have any helpful links please email them to me and I will post them. 

Jaye Rancourt an Unethical New Hampshire Attorney who likes money more than her clients kids - Is an attorney who practices with the Law Firm of Brennan, Caron, Lenehan & Iacopino also known as BCLI located in Manchester NH

In the near future I will be posting information about Attorney Jaye Rancourt’s unethical and what I would consider to be criminal behavior. Please be aware that these are my opinions. You decide the facts.

I started this Blog because I feel that the public needs to know what kind of pathetic excuse of person Jaye Rancourt is and that there are thousands of attorneys out there just like her doing the same thing every day and I am hoping to reach out to others that have been wronged by these attorneys and the Divorce Court and/or Family Court.

My opinion of Jaye Rancourt is that she is a blood sucking thief. This woman represents my ex-wife and has had me in court repeatedly for frivolous nonsense. Read the book People of the Lie author M. Scott Peck. If you do you will understand that there are evil people all around us. These people are Lawyers, Doctors, Judges, Elected Officials, and Emergency Services Workers. They need to fit in with the rest of us. These people often seem to be outgoing. They are people who volunteer their time. They do this to look good. Do a Google search on Jaye Rancourt and read. Is she a person who fits this behavior? I believe so.

Three years ago I filed for a divorce. It seems my ex-wife has some issues that I brought up in court which I was told by the Judge I could not release to the public so will be respectful and I have to be careful about what I say about any records I have seen in regards to my ex-wife.

Since I can't discuss certain written and documented things about my ex-wife I will say that in my opinion my ex-wife is a sick person who, in my opinion exhibits patterns of behavior consistent with people who have personality disorders. Rancourt took advantage of this and fleeced my ex-wife and hurt my kids in the process of doing so. In the process she destroyed my ability to defend myself by running up the divorce cost well over 100K between both sides. At the time of my divorce, my ex and I had a combined salary of around 80K. We both made about 40K each. Rancourt purposely made my divorce a Hollywood divorce. She never once thought about my children which incidentally my ex-wife was successful in alienating them from me with Rancourt's help.

Did I mention that as of right now, my ex-wife owes Rancourt and her firm over 50k in legal fees? She is supposedly making payments of $300 to $400 a month. Guess where my child support goes? It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out directly into the pocket of Jaye Rancourt. Guess who appears to be padding their retirement by stealing money from children? Of course the court doesn’t see it this way. The court has admonished me for bringing this issue up and states that my ex-wife can spend her money how she sees fit. If you figure out the current payment plan, Rancourt will probable be paid off when my last child turns eighteen. No coincidence here is there?

My ex-wife threatened me in front of a marriage counselor that she was going to keep the children from me long before our divorce. Thanks to Rancourt it was all too easy. She will go to court and she will present the Judge with false or misleading facts. I have proof of her tactics and will be posting some of these public court documents as time permits.

Here is the way Rancourt begins her operation. She begins by taking an unsuspecting person who is down and turns on the charm and then fleeces them. It's just like the man that is walking in the park and gets beat up and mugged by two guys and has his watch and wallet stolen. The man stumbles to his feet, walks out of the park and sees two guys walking towards him. He says to the two guys please help me sirs, I’ve been mugged. They beat me up and stole my watch and wallet. The two men then drags this unsuspecting person back into the park, beats him up some more and then steal his shoes and shirt. Yes folks, this is the type of attorney you will be dealing with Rancourt.

Do not expect any reasoning with Jaye Rancourt. Every thing that happens between you and your ex will turn into World War III. She will make a mountain out of a mole hill and in the end you will lose. Great if you’re the person who hires her. I just hope if you do hire her or go up against her that you don't have kids. She will screw them up for life. I have many pictures of my kids being with me and happy. This was before Rancourt. Now my kids hate me. My 7 year old said to me he doesn't want to talk to me anymore. He said you don't care about me and I know what you did. You are a mean person. Does this sound like a seven year old talking? Of course it doesn’t. It was my ex talking. It scared me to hear this. The voice was my son’s but the person speaking was my ex. It was the same thing that she said to me numerously when we were married and she was delusional.

I am going to be filing a complaint with the Professional Conduct Committee on Jaye Rancourt. I would encourage others who have had negative experiences with her or any other attorney to do the same. Let’s hit these bad people where it counts which is in their wallets. I will assist anyone who needs help bringing a complaint against this attorney and/or her law firm BRENNAN, CARON, LENEHAN & IACOPINO because I feel it’s the right thing to do.

I will be posing an email address shortly with this blog. Please feel free to email me and by all means feel free to blog here. We all need to put our foot down and tell these types of attorneys and the courts that this behavior is not acceptable. No one has the right to become rich off of children’s emotional wellbeing..

In addition, when you come across Judges that are bad, make sure you make complaints and go to websites where you can blog about these bad judges. One such blog that I recently found is the Courthouse Forum.

Check out this link. http://www.courthouseforum.com/forums/view.php?id=1065123

I posted comments about Marital Master David Forrest. He is another contributing factor to Jaye Rancourt’s success. Forrest continually allows Rancourt’s nonsense even when there is no basis for it. My ex and Jaye Rancourt have done numerous things including lying to discredit me and have portrayed me as a deadbeat dad, my ex-wife has made false reports to police about me and they used this nonsense to keep my kids from me. Just before the divorce Rancourt and my ex-wife placed a frivolous Temporary Restraining Order on me as my ex claimed that I threatened to kill her. The restraining order hearing was to take place the same day that the divorce hearing was talking place. Before I had a chance to defend myself, Rancourt and my ex-wife withdrew the petition. Forrest should have admonished Rancourt and her client for this stunt. Yes stunt. Why else would someone do this during a divorce hearing when there has never been any such accusations against me by my ex-wife or anyone else for that matter? I’ve come to the conclusion that people in jail have more of a right to have a relationship with their children then I do. This Marital Master loves conflict and thrives from it. Jaye Rancourt and David Forest fuel each others fire. You can go to this website and use this site to make comments about judges and evaluate them. I would recommend you do so and fill out the surveys and leave your comments.

In regards to my children, I am not an overly religious person but if there is a god out there, I pray that someday he will reunite me with them. As for right now, I don’t have any resources to hire an attorney to assist with my objectives so I will have to go it by myself and with the help of my loving partner for without her strength, I don’t know how I would continue. Please support me and others like me by blogging and making complaints about the court system, the unethical attorneys and in anyway else you can. I am not the only one out there with the same problem. Together we can all try to make a difference and reunite parents and alienated children.

Check out this link. http://www.courthouseforum.com/forums/view.php?id=1065123