Family Court In NH Is A Joke – Marital Master David Forrest Is The Ringmaster Of A Three Ring Circus

In Master Forest’s Three Ring Circus first comes the bickering, his deciphering and then men’s suffering. 

In looking back at my divorce file I noted a lot of things that were interesting.  My Alienated children can someday look back at what Forrest did to them and thank Forrest for devaluing their father and empowering their mother, an Alienating parent who thinks of her needs over her children’s needs.  I have records in a safe place and someday when my kids are older, I will let them look through the records so that they can learn the real truth and not the lies that their mother has filled their minds with. 

First of all Forrest made a lot of decisions on hearsay and testimony with no evidence presented.  Keep in mind that in a divorce, the burden of proof is the preponderance of evidence.  Not proof beyond the reason of doubt.  What does this translate into?  Whoever has the better story and who ever is more believable wins.  The burden of preponderance of evidence gives people like Forrest too much leeway and too much power.  They can totally ruin a person if they see fit to.  For the common person you don’t have the resources to fight it.  It is so costly you will end up bankrupt before your divorce is done and plan on a two year fight.  This is the atmosphere that Forrest encourages.  He like conflict.  I think he feels empowered by it. 

An example of Forrest poor judgment is, my ex told Forrest that she paid for my $10k college loan and told Forrest that I didn’t work much.  He liked her story.  She provided no physical evidence.  Just her testimony.  Forrest in his decision stated he believed what my ex-wife had said. He took her word over mine.  Why? He is a biased man hating pig.   I told Forrest when I testified that I have records that prove my ex was lying. 

I have records from the government showing that I paid off most of my loans prior to our marriage and the government paid off most of the rest when Bill Clinton signed a law reimbursing police officers on their student loans for service as a full time cop.  I brought this up to Forrest at the hearing but he decided that I was lying and took my ex wife’s testimony as gospel.  Call me a liar now Forrest.  I have your written decision and I have the records in my possession and can prove what I say is true. 

I also have my statements from SSN. When I was married, I made more money then my ex did.  How is that possible for a low life blood sucking leach that Forrest portrayed me out to be?  In his decision he portrays me out to be a man whore that worked part time and was unemployed most of the time when in fact I worked long hours with lots of overtime to support my ex wife’s spending habits.  Oh that’s right, my ex told him I was a deadbeat husband and again he believed her. 

When I questioned my ex in court, I caught her in several lies.  She testified that she never called State Police on me.  I provided Forrest a State Police Report where my ex called and spoke with a Trooper inquiring how she could legally get me out of the house.  The Trooper asked if I was abusive to her or the kids in which she stated no that I was not.  The trooper told her there was nothing he could do for her.  My ex’s response was that was what her attorney told her (This was her second attorney and not Jaye Rancourt). 

I had to deal with this kind of crap and maintain my job as a cop at the same time.  Forrest should have given me a medal for being able to deal with my while maintaining my job.  My ex totally denied that it was her who called this Trooper and spoke with him.  My ex in my opinion is sick but let me tell you, she knew what she was doing.  Her moves were calculated. 

If you are going through a divorce, learn about personality disorders.  Many people have them.  If you can learn about personality disorders, it may help with your situation if you can understand what you’re dealing with. 

Just remember, a system that allows a person like Forrest to make decisions on the preponderance of evidence is bound to fail.  People like Forrest abuse their power.  If you have a contested divorce in front of Forrest and you are a man, I would recommend that you ask him to recuse himself from the case due to his being biased.  Forrest does not have the ability to be fair to men.  I have had numerous people contact me because of this blog and they tell me their stories of how Forrest abused them and condoned giving full custody of their children to the alienating parent.  I hope that my stories about Forrest unethical behavior will help others to deal with their divorce and custody issues.  Anyone wanting to contact me with their stories or for assistance can be assured that I will keep there identity anonymous. 

Cheshire County Judge John P. Arnold and Marital Master David S. Forrest Fail Surveys On The Courthouse Forum!

It’s pathetic that we have Judge’s and Marital Masters in Cheshire County that rate so poor on surveys.  The NH Judicial system needs a reform.  It’s too bad we can’t vote these people out of office like they do in other states.  

If you go to the Courthouse Forum with the following link:

http://www.courthouseforum.com///forums/directory.php?letter=a

You will be on a page that has Judge John P. Arnold’s score.  Arnold received a D- rating. 

Click on the F tab to go to Forrest.  He rated slightly better with a D+. 

It is no wonder why Cheshire County Superior Court has so many issues when it comes to the marital division.  Please go to the Courthouse Forum and take the survey. 

Cheshire County Superior Court in New Hampshire – What a disaster for anyone involved with this court for Domestic situations – Why is this Court so screwed up?

I have had such negative experiences with this court including Judge John P. Arnold Who is responsible for running this court and Marital Master David Forrest.

I call up the Marital Department the other day.  I asked what’s going on with the motion that I filed.  I’m told that the Judge approved it but the person I’m speaking with can’t elaborate on just what that means.  They then tell me that my ex-wife’s motion was approved and she is now being awarded all of my equity from the sale of the marital home (The original decree awarded me a 45% portion).  The Judge ruled on her motion.  I ask if he ruled on my response to her motion which was an objection.  I’m told that there are a few other motions that are in the file that should have been ruled on and were not(and in a non committed manner was basically told that the court screwed up).  Apparently my other two motions I submitted were just placed aside somewhere and never looked at. 

I then asked when was my ex-wife’s motion was ruled on and why do I not have it.  I’m told that the motion was ruled on September 2^nd and was sent to me by the court on September 10^th and I should have it by now (Today meaning September 14^th).  Now I checked my mail yesterday and there was nothing there.  I then check my mail in the late afternoon of the 14^th.  Low and behold the motion is there.  The envelope is postmarked September 10^th.  It took eight days for the court to send me a ruling that was signed on the 2^nd.  It took another 4 days for me to get it for a total of 14 days.  The court was responsible for holding this document a minimum of eight days before sending it.  What’s up with this?  You have ten days to respond to something that takes 14 days for the court to get to you. 

I then call the Marital Department again the next day on September 15^th to find out if I have to be in court in the beginning of October as the motion I originally filed and had now withdrawn which was the reason for the court action being initiated.  I’m told by the person handling this matter that she was gone for two days and has a stack of stuff to get through and that she would try to get to mine by tomorrow and I was welcome to call back tomorrow to see if she processed the file.  I had explained that I was eight hundred miles away and traveling to NH for something ridiculous would cause a great deal of burden on me. 

What is wrong with this court?  What is wrong with Judge Arnold?  He is supposed to be running his court.  It would appear that he is not doing too good of a job.  If simple tasks can not be performed in an efficient manner what does this mean when we go in front of the court with issues on our children?  My opinion is that the court doesn’t want to deal with our children and that is why issues like parent alienation exist.  Do you think that the court has our children’s best interest at hand?  From my experiences I would say no. 

I plan on filing a complaint with the judicial system.