tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4340635590080462435.post4951220418247555658..comments2023-03-27T05:31:55.989-04:00Comments on NH Attorney Jaye Rancourt an Unethical Attorney: NH House investigating impeaching marital master - From The Website Of The Washington ExaminerFighting Backhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10680648824756930269noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4340635590080462435.post-43278368745963015002013-04-30T19:16:02.236-04:002013-04-30T19:16:02.236-04:00Modern Faces of Racism by the Elite of New Hampshi...Modern Faces of Racism by the Elite of New Hampshire<br />These are actual quotes from court documents of a 2003 divorce by the NH Judicial Branch. Notice who is the current Chief Justice. I was falsely arrested by the AG after I tried to sue the State for the Title IV Civil Rights violation. (Unlawful Court Ordered Racial Segregation in Education) <br />“In . .’s best interest I recommend that he attend the Burnham School in Haverhill (MA)….Furthermore, the issue of diversity is real. . . would likely find it lonely being the only Black child in a school in NH. He has a rich Black Heritage of which to be proud. He can share with and learn from other children of his color and it can enhance his growing up years in numerous ways. In Haverhill (MA), he has that opportunity far more that it exists in NH.” –Patricia Frim, Esq., Court Appointed Guardian ad Litem, 07/14/03 <br /> “Ultimately, the court finds that the most important factors are diversity and crime. Given the information presented on the issue of diversity...the Court concludes that the Burnham school in Haverhill (MA) would be the more appropriate placement for . .”- Marital Master Harriet J. Fishman Case No. 02-M-0032 (Approved Judge Gerald Taube). 08/05/03<br /> “No appeal, however, is declined except by unanimous vote of the court with at least three justices participating. No justice who considered this matter voted to accept this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal was declined. If any justice who considered this matter believed the appeal should have been accepted, this case would have been scheduled for briefing. Declined. Brock, C.J., and Broderick, Nadeau, Dalianis and Duggan, JJ., concurred. Case No. 03-0640, (Declining to hear appeal of Case 02-M-0032), 11/21/03) NH Justices denied the respondent’s appeal without opinion.<br />“District Attorney Jonathan Blodgett offered assistance to Haverhill from the federal and state law enforcement agencies in fight local gangs. In Haverhill, there have been a lot of shootings since August, with most of the activity in the Arlington Street and Acre neighborhoods. Some residents who have been asking for help since the beginning of the year, have become so frustrated that they are moving out.” By Taylor Armerding, “The correct response: How soon can the FBI be here?, Lawrence Eagle Tribune-2005<br /><br />FACTS <br />Racial Imbalance-the condition of a public school in which more than 50% of the pupils attending are non-white. - Mass. Gen. Law. Chap. 71 § 37D. Minority Student Enrollment-Burnham School-62% . The 2000-2003, Haverhill Public Schools among the “below average” performing school systems in the Commonwealth. MCAS test, 76.9% of the African American students and 83.9% of the Hispanic American students in Haverhill scored in the “Needs Improvement” and “Warning/Failing” categories.- -Mass Dept of Ed-Haverhill Exam Report, 2004. Haverhill Public Schools, “Persistent Failure to meet Adequate Yearly Progress” MA Dept of Ed Report, 2004. “The 29 lowest-scoring elementary school districts include Boston, Haverhill, Holyoke, Lawrence, Lowell….” Executive Dept., 2005<br /> “Title I facilitator” (poverty rate of at least 40 percent) to provide educational services to students who are educationally disadvantaged, low academic achievement or are at risk of failing to meet state standards. U.S. Dept of Ed- (Low Income 58.7%-Burnham School) De Facto residential segregation, “High Hispanic population,”-Patricia Frim, Esq., 2003 “Crime rates in Haverhill are among the highest in Massachusetts cities, surpassing Lawrence in every category and even showing that city residents and businesses are the most susceptible to burglary of any major city in the state.” Lawrence-Eagle Tribune. BlackBullhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03580603358278509781noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4340635590080462435.post-27898038246708389552012-08-18T06:03:54.165-04:002012-08-18T06:03:54.165-04:00GM: I have been in front of Master Cross several t...GM: I have been in front of Master Cross several times, I have been in Portsmouth Family Court for my case 24 times. Prior before Philip Cross we faced Harriet Fisherman who got benched from releasing children to a kidnapping parent that took the children outside the US to a country that had no Hague Convention Laws. My ex=wife is from a different country has only been here 7 years. She got caught on 3 different accounts of child abuse by Master Cross. She had left bruises and burn marks on the child, which is my son. The Ex-boyfriend came in and testified stating he witness her locking the child in the basement. Also Exhibited was the fact she got caught on welfare fraud, she owns property internationally , takes yearly vacations and just recently returned with breast implants while on full welfare benefits including section 8 Gosling Meadows where she was caught on fraud by high end lawyers Shaheen. I recently stated to the court they can hang downtown Portsmouth before I pay into this chaos that makes no sense what so ever. My son should have been taken away from the mother on a permit bases after her ex-boyfriend stated on the stand that the child was repeated lock in a dark basement. Philip Cross did however put some restrictions on the mother by not allowing her to leave the child with any other then the father, the child must be with the father only. They took the child away at one point time for 30 days only when he was physically abused by her. I have no room for abusive parents female or male. The very problem with this state in the family court system is that is a business with DHHS child support. There are many groups that support even the most abusive and neglectful mothers regardless of there wrong doing due from the money of supportive groups and directors that run them. Once you look at the NH Family Courts as a business then you will start to understand why they are bias in the positions. I do not pay child support anymore which was suspended because I proved the mother was in fraud with welfare. It took 120,000.00 of top lawyer to do so which should have been seen clearly before but over looked. It sad because the children suffer from one wrong parent, the courts are so money broke and over run they go with the flow and fill there interest with the DHHS money. Its the judges , but worse its the system. In my opinion all judges should have to be phycologist rather then ex-lawyers that will only lean towards the money rather then the truth. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4340635590080462435.post-68081735712668008712011-11-21T15:34:37.723-05:002011-11-21T15:34:37.723-05:00So after reading all the comments I guess my quest...So after reading all the comments I guess my question would be as I go before master Alice Love once again to not have my side heard is all hope lost will I loose my daughter to a father who is unstable and on drugsAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4340635590080462435.post-74812449455053538662011-05-02T17:04:07.565-04:002011-05-02T17:04:07.565-04:00The biggest problem as I see it is that the Judges...The biggest problem as I see it is that the Judges and Marital Masters have too much power and discretion in family courts as well as in the civil courts. In a criminal court the burden of proof is “Proof beyond reasonable doubt.” In the civil and family courts the burden is the “Preponderance of evidence.” The term preponderance of evidence has in recent years translated into who has the best story and who can lie the best. I know from experiences. My ex-wife told Master David Forrest she paid for my college loans. I stated that she didn’t and that president Clinton thanks to a grant and myself paid for my college. Forrest being incompetent believed my ex. My ex submitted no proof. Just a story. Funny thing but several months after the divorce, I found my paperwork showing just what I had testified to. I hope that someday my children want to know the real truth about what happened in my divorce. When they are old enough I will not hesitate to give them the paperwork I have in storage. If they start reading the documents that I have, they will see just how much their mother lied about their father. They will also become educated about how screwed up our legal system really is.Fighting Backhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10680648824756930269noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4340635590080462435.post-87243044122141477242011-05-02T01:36:09.309-04:002011-05-02T01:36:09.309-04:00The comments stating the opposition to the Cross i...The comments stating the opposition to the Cross impeachment claimed it was about contentious divorces and that the "allegations were proven untrue and misrepresentations." After many hours of observation in these complaint hearings, I'll explain simply that Master Cross' supporters are none other than his affiliates and colleagues. In English, his buddies are lying for him. Representative Lucy Weber and NH Supreme Court Counsel Howard Zibbel were the ones who misrepresented the facts. Listening to them speak is like knowing that it's dark outside and they're telling everyone it's daylight. The House split along party lines. The huge government Democrats rely upon the activism of the Judiciary.David Johnsonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4340635590080462435.post-73497664318680832282011-04-03T10:48:41.366-04:002011-04-03T10:48:41.366-04:00The impeachment of Cross is just a start. If you ...The impeachment of Cross is just a start. If you look into Marital Master David Forrest’s record, you will see that he too has a track record in alienating children from their parents and making decisions that are biased. I am so disgusted by the family court system in NH that I have taken it upon myself to write a blog (http://unethicalattorney.blogspot.com/). I use actual examples of what has happened to me and how my two children who are now seven and eleven were alienated from me due to incompetency of the NH Family Court system. <br /><br />I have heard it said over and over again that impeachment of Cross and other Marital Masters in NH is just about a few angry individuals that didn’t like the outcome of their divorces. Why is it when you disagree with something that is wrong you are labeled an angry person? Was George Washington and all of our four fathers just angry individuals that decided to rebel for no reason? What if our four fathers just ignored their civic obligations because someone told them they were just angry people? <br /><br />The truth is, it is more then just a few angry individuals and the problems with the NH Family Courts as well as other family courts are real. Reading the comments posted here shows just how deep the problem runs.Fighting Backhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10680648824756930269noreply@blogger.com